Big Pharma’s toxic drugs will kill over 45,000% more people than global warming by the year 2100, scientists discover … Media SILENT

 

Image: Big Pharma’s toxic drugs will kill over 45,000% more people than global warming by the year 2100, scientists discover … Media SILENT

Natural News) A study by researchers from the University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill has sent shock-waves across the globe with its finding that over 260,000 people will die prematurely by the year 2100 because of air pollution triggered by global warming. The “catastrophic man-made global warming” alarmists love these kinds of studies, of course, because they reinforce their doomsday predictions. However, even if these researchers’ alarming findings are 100 percent reliable (and there is enough conflicting evidence out there to make that highly unlikely), even a quarter of a million people would be a drop in the ocean compared to the number of people that Big Pharma will likely kill by 2100. More on that later.

The UNC researchers reached their alarming conclusions after analyzing data from the globe’s top climate change modeling groups. Well, that already puts their findings on shaky ground, doesn’t it? (Related: The REAL FAKE NEWS exposed: ‘97% of scientists agree on climate change’ is an engineered hoax … Here’s what the media never told you.)

According to the Daily Mail, the researchers believe that hotter temperatures will cause an increase in the speed of the chemical reactions that cause air pollutants, and that as areas become increasingly drier, there will be less rain to remove these pollutants. These higher temperatures will also cause trees to emit more organic pollutants.

The study predicts that this toxic combination will result in killer smog that will kill 260,000 people across the globe (with the exception of Africa) by 2100.

The Mail reports:

The rise in toxic air pollution adds to other risk of death from climate change including heat stress, a lack of clean water and food, severe storms and the spread of infectious diseases.

The study was published in the Nature journal, Climate Change.

Of course, the mainstream media has been quick to jump all over this story, blasting readers with headlines like the Mail’s “Global warming will cause 260,000 premature deaths from air pollution by 2100, shocking study finds.” While that number does seem high, and it is true that pollution causes many deaths worldwide each year, there is a far more alarming number that the mainstream media has made no attempt to disclose: The number of deaths attributable to Big Pharma and its toxic chemicals.

The website PharmaDeathClock.com has been shining a light on this disturbing number for some time now. It constantly updates real-time numbers of victims killed by Big Pharma in the U.S. and worldwide since January 1, 2000. Some of the numbers included are for deaths which are not directly attributable to the pharmaceutical companies, including things like medical error, hospital errors and hospital malnutrition.

Nonetheless, if we include only the figures for deaths which can directly be blamed on Big Pharma, a staggering 21,483,350 (at the time of writing) people died at their hands since 2000. That’s a mind-blowing average of 1,227,620 per year for the past 17.5 years.

Figures included were for deaths resulting from: Chemotherapy; adverse drug reactions; SSRIs; prescription drugs; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; opioids; benzodiazepines; antidepressant overdoses; anti-epileptic and anti-Parkinsonism drugs; systemic and hematological drugs; antipsychotic and neuroleptic drugs; acetaminophen-related deaths; respiratory drugs; cardiovascular drugs; barbiturates; autonomic nervous system drugs; anesthetics and therapeutic gases; hormones, insulins and glucocorticoids; anti-infectives; diuretics and other drugs, medicaments and biological substances; and topical drugs.

Based on the aforementioned average, by the year 2100, 122,762,000 people will have been killed by Big Pharma – a number that is more than 45,000 percent higher than the number of people predicted to die from so-called global warming.

This begs the question: Why is the media silent? Who will speak for the millions who have died and will continue to die at the hands of the greedy pharmaceutical giants?

Sources include:

DailyMail.co.uk

PharmaDeathClock.com

 

Monster Van Dam’:Q-koorts 76 doden. Gekke Koeien ziekte 3 doden. 200 duizend verbrande Varkense en miljoenen Giftige eieren in de Supermark. — Volksnieuws uit Amsterdam-Noir

(van onze PvdA Untergang redactie) AMSTERDAM-NOIR- Gangster-Varkensbaron-Beul-Straathof’ had vrij spel van PvdA ‘Banencarrousel-Martijn van Dam(Video). Staats-NOS:” onze Martijn van Dam is een goede en deskundige PvdA man, maar pas op voor Poetin, Wilders en Holleeder”.Het’ PvdA -Monster -Martijn van Dam’ heeft de facto 10.000 x meer schade aan de maatschappij aangericht dan Willem Holleeder, die door […]

via Monster Van Dam’:Q-koorts 76 doden. Gekke Koeien ziekte 3 doden. 200 duizend verbrande Varkense en miljoenen Giftige eieren in de Supermark. — Volksnieuws uit Amsterdam-Noir

The South African Chemical and Biological Warfare Program: An Overview

The Nonproliferation Review/Fall-Winter 2000
CHANDRÉ GOULD & PETER I. FOLB

The South African Chemical and Biological
Warfare Program: An Overview
Chandré Gould is an Associate Researcher at the Centre for Conflict Resolution in Cape Town. Peter I. Folb, MD, FRCP (London), FRS (South Africa) is Professor of Pharmacology, University of Cape Town, and Director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Drug Policy. Both authors participated in the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s investigation into chemical and biological warfare conducted in 1997 and 1998. This research project is hosted by the Centre for Conflict Resolution in Cape Town and supported by funding from the Ford Foundation, Frederick Ebert Stiftung, and the Norwegian government.

In 1998, the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) held a public hearing into the chemical and biological warfare (CBW) program established under the auspices of the South African Defence Force (SADF) in the early 1980s. Witnesses who
gave evidence at the hearing included scientists who had staffed the chemical and biological research and production facilities of the program; the former project officer,
Dr. Wouter Basson; and the project manager and former surgeon general, Daniel (Niel) Knobel. This public hearing was a first of its kind in the world. Nowhere else had a government or military establishment been required to account openly and fully to the public for the development and daily activities of a national chemical and biological weapons program. A separate criminal trial of Dr. Basson, which is still underway as of this writing (September 2000), has produced additional information about the program.
At the TRC hearing, military documents were presented that described the nature of work that was done as well as the management of the program.
This article is based primarily on documents that were made available to the press and public during the official TRC hearings by the surgeon general of the military and others in their testimony, or have appeared as exhibits in the criminal trial of Dr. Wouter Basson. This article presents an overview of the South African CBW program as revealed
through these documents, the testimony of witnesses at the hearing and in the trial, and interviews and other research conducted by the authors during a three-year investigation.
The article begins by presenting the official reasons given for the initiation of the program, which emphasized a need to counter a perceived threat that chemical
weapons might be used against South African soldiers.
The article then describes the nature of the program and its structure. Subsequent sections then provide more detail on the military chain of command, the recruitment
of scientists, the nature of the products researched and developed, and the conduct of operations that were linked to the CBW program. The article then summarizes the

evidence revealed at the TRC of international collaboration with the program. A short analysis of the criminal trial of Basson concludes the overview.

CONTINUE READING

Published on 4 Nov 2014

Project Coast: Was the South African Apartheid regime’s secret bio-weapon’s lab, and its connection with British scientist and authority on biological warfare, David Kelly; and their secret bio-weapon’s and eugenics program. The colonial Apartheid regime’s goal was to develop GMO bio-weapons aimed toward genociding the native Black, South African populations, using weaponized Anthax, Ebola, Marburg and sterilization through toxic vaccines.
See:
http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/10/pro…
see also:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_…

Uploaded on 10 Jan 2008

7 January 2000
An examination of the chemical and biological Programme developed under the apartheid regime in the 80’s.

WHO SAYS EBOLA OUTBREAK MAY NOT BE AS BIG AS FEARED, EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE MAY NOT BE REQUIRED

Via: https://birdflu666.wordpress.com/2017/05/26/who-says-ebola-outbreak-may-not-be-as-big-as-feared-experimental-vaccine-may-not-be-required/

 

Helen Branswell
There are signs that the Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo may not be as big as was once feared, World Health Organization officials indicated Thursday.

Fourteen suspected cases have tested negative for the deadly virus, Alison Clements-Hunt, a WHO spokeswoman currently in Likati, the epicenter of the response, told STAT in an interview.

So far there have been two confirmed cases, four probable cases, and four deaths. Another 40 people are currently listed as suspected cases, said Clements-Hunt. Roughly 300 people who are contacts of known or suspected cases are being monitored to see if they develop symptoms.

Given what appears to be the limited scope of the outbreak, the use of an experimental Ebola vaccine may not be required. 

“For the time, there doesn’t seem that there was really a necessity to do so. I hope it remains the case,” Dr. Marie-Paule Kieny, a WHO assistant director-general, told STAT. 
That said, Kieny confirmed planning continues to allow for deployment of vaccine, if the government of DRC asks for it. But it may not, she acknowledged. 

https://www.statnews.com/2017/05/25/ebola-congo-update/

The current explosion of vaccine related injuries

“There appears to be a war being waged across the U.S. regarding mandatory vaccination targeted at our youngest and most vulnerable and also our healthcare and childcare workers. Now there is narrative starting to be put forward that unvaccinated adults are costing the economy billions of dollars a year. This is all based on the […]

via The current explosion of vaccine related injuries — Vaccines

Israeli Planes Spray Herbicides Inside Gaza for the Fourth Time This Year

GLOBAL RESEARCH – Israeli planes have been reported spraying herbicides over land inside the Gaza Strip on four occasions in 2017, including twice in the last two days (…) This year marks a decade since the start of Israel’s siege on the Gaza Strip. Israel controls Gaza’s airspace and territorial waters, as well as all of its land crossings […]

via Israeli Planes Spray Herbicides Inside Gaza for the Fourth Time This Year — The Ugly Truth

Israeli planes have been reported spraying herbicides over land inside the Gaza Strip on four occasions in 2017, including twice in the last two days.

Israeli planes sprayed herbicides inside the Gaza Strip for the second day running on Wednesday and the fourth time this year, according to local farmers and Israeli rights NGO Gisha. A video published on Wednesday, allegedly of the crop-dusting, shows a plane flying low and spraying over farmland.

Palestinians who reported the incident said that the planes had dusted near the Gaza border fence, and the Gaza Ministry of Agriculture is investigating the extent of the damage from the herbicides sprayed over the last two days. Around 840 acres of crops were damaged during the last round of spraying in January 2017, according to Gisha.

https://web.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fweb.facebook.com%2Fgisha.eng%2Fvideos%2F1365573953528960%2F&show_text=0&width=400

The dusting of Palestinian-owned farmland inside the Gaza Strip did not begin this year. As +972 reported at the time, Israeli planes sprayed herbicides over vegetation in Gaza for several consecutive days in December 2015, damaging over 400 acres of crops.

The IDF confirmed to +972 that it was responsible for spraying the farmland, but didn’t elaborate as to why, beyond the amorphous designation of “security operations.” A number of Palestinian farmers have since demanded compensation from the State of Israel.

Israeli planes have returned to spray herbicides numerous times since the end of 2015. The government, meanwhile, has contradicted itself over the area it claims to have targeted: despite the IDF’s confirmation to +972, and later to Gisha, that it had sprayed herbicides inside the Gaza Strip, the Israeli Ministry of Defense later claimed in a court hearing on the issue that the work had been carried out by private companies — and only on Israeli territory.

Palestinian children take pictures of each other in the no-go zone near Erez crossing, during the weekly demonstration against the occupation in Beit Hanoun, Gaza Strip, Tuesday, February 7, 2012. (Anne Paq/Activestills.org)

Palestinian children take pictures of each other in the no-go zone near Erez crossing, during the weekly demonstration against the occupation in Beit Hanoun, Gaza Strip, Tuesday, February 7, 2012. (Anne Paq/Activestills.org)

Since 2000, Israel has maintained a no-go area inside the Gaza border fence — formally referred to as the “Access-Restricted Area” (ARA) — which currently reaches 300 meters inside Gazan territory. The army enforces this buffer zone with everything from “less-lethal” weapons to live ammunition and tank fire, making it a particularly deadly stretch of land. Israeli bulldozers also reportedly enter the Gaza Strip on a regular basis to level land inside the ARA.

Farmers and scrap collectors who venture near the border are frequently targeted by Israeli sniper fire, including those who were apparently well outside the buffer zone. Most recently, a 15-year-old Palestinian, Yousef Shaaban Abu Athra, was killed when an IDF tank opened fire at him and two companions, who were wounded. The army claimed that the three had been acting suspiciously.

In addition to the land buffer zone, Israel restricts Palestinians to fishing within six nautical miles of the Gaza coast, and the navy regularly opens fire on fishermen who are deemed to have ventured further away from the shoreline.

This year marks a decade since the start of Israel’s siege on the Gaza Strip. Israel controls Gaza’s airspace and territorial waters, as well as all of its land crossings save for Rafah, which is controlled by Egypt and closed on all but the rarest of occasions. Gaza’s exports and imports are also controlled by Israel, as is the movement of people — residents and otherwise — in and out of the enclave.

At the time of writing, the IDF Spokesperson had yet to respond to a request for comment on the latest incident of crop-spraying. Should a response be received, it will be included here.

Monsanto’s Weedkiller Is Officially Most Used In History Of Chemical Agriculture [The GMO connection]

Bron: http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/monsantos-weedkiller-is-officially-most-used-in-history-of-chemical-agriculture-the-gmo-connection/

By Tami Canal

Monsanto’s best-selling herbicide is officially the most used weed-killer in the global history of chemical agriculture, according to an important paper published in the journal, Environmental Sciences Europe.

The author of the landmark paper, Charles Benbrook, PhD, emphasizes “The dramatic and rapid growth in overall use of glyphosate will likely contribute to a host of adverse environmental and public health consequences.”

Dr. Benbrook also makes the connection between glyphosate exposure and many serious health effects, including liver and kidney diseases, as well as non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

“My hope is that this paper will stimulate more research on glyphosate use, and human and environmental exposure patterns, to increase the chance that scientists will quickly detect any problems that might be triggered, or made worse by glyphosate exposure,” Benbrook notes.

The paper details that nearly 19 billion pounds (8.6 billion kilograms) of glyphosate have been used world wide since the introduction of “Roundup Ready” GMO crops in the mid-90s. In 2014 alone, enough glyphosate was sprayed to cover three-quarters of every harvested acre of cropland in the U.S.

Most shocking, 74% of all glyphosate ever sprayed has been done so in the last decade as the amount of genetically engineered crops have grown exponentially across the globe.

Glyphosate is now made generically and is used in numerous products, not just Roundup.

“This report makes it clear that the use of glyphosate combined with the dominance of genetically engineered crops has produced an looming public health threat both in the U.S. and around the world. Farmers have sprayed billions of pounds of a chemical now considered a probable human carcinogen over the past decade. Spraying has increased to multiple times a year recently on the majority of U.S. cropland. The sheer volume of use of this toxic weed-killer is a clear indication that this chemical dependency is a case of farming gone wrong,” Mary Ellen Kustin, a top-ranking policy analyst for the Environmental Working Group, stated in response to Dr. Benbrook’s research.

Kustin’s comments reflect the World Health Organization’s March 2015 declaration that glyphosate ‘probably’ causes cancer. The assessment was reached unanimously by the opinion of 17 experts from 11 different countries who convened last spring to review the carcinogenicity of glyphosate among other organophosphate pesticides.

(Monsanto promptly accused the agency of having an “agenda” and “cherry picking” the damning research.)

Monsanto’s cancer-causing weedkiller has not only contaminated a majority of the food supply, it has also been detected in childhood vaccines (there are zero safety studies on the health effects of injecting weedkiller), the umbilical cord blood of newborn babies, prenatal vitamins, the breast milk of nursing mothers, drinking water supplies, and air samples.

To read Dr. Benbrook’s paper in its entirety, please visit the Environmental Working Group by clicking here.

For more information on how to get involved in the May 20th, 2017 March Against Monsanto, please email addmymarch@gmail.com.